From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 17, 1984
448 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 83-295, 83-718.

April 17, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Maria M. Korvick, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Diane Leeds and Richard Doran, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.


We affirm the convictions appealed. We remand, however, for the entry of an order detailing the trial court's reasons for retaining jurisdiction in accordance with section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and for clarification to reflect that the court retains jurisdiction during one third of the total sentence. Goree v. State, 411 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Affirmed and remanded.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 17, 1984
448 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:PERCIVAL MICHAEL MARSHALL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 17, 1984

Citations

448 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

State v. Snow, 462 So.2d 455, 457 (Fla. 1985); Marshall v. Dugger, 526 So.2d 143, 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See…

Weaver v. State

However, we remand the cause for correction of the written sentences so as to make them reflect, consistent…