From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2014
No. CV13-1361 PHX DGC (JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV13-1361 PHX DGC (JFM)

02-24-2014

Charles Marshall, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Charles Marshall has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate James F. Metcalf has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 13. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

__________

David G. Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marshall v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2014
No. CV13-1361 PHX DGC (JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Marshall v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Charles Marshall, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 24, 2014

Citations

No. CV13-1361 PHX DGC (JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tinsley v. Valenzuela

that it was not deciding a federal constitutional issue, the Ninth Circuit held in a published decision that…

Gonzalez v. Ryan

Judge Duncan found Petitioner's argument based upon Martinez to be "unpersuasive because Martinez does not…