From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. RN/BC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 7, 2022
2:22-cv-01551-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01551-RFB-BNW

12-07-2022

George Lee Marshall Jr., Plaintiff, v. RN/BC, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff initiated this case on September 15, 2022. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff's first filing did not include a filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”). Id. Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an IFP application or pay the filing fee by October 7, 2022. ECF No. 3. The Court advised Plaintiff that a failure to comply with its order would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Id. Since this last order, Plaintiff has not taken any action in this case. Accordingly, it appears Plaintiff abandoned his case.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice and this case closed.

NOTICE

This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within 14 days of being served with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Marshall v. RN/BC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 7, 2022
2:22-cv-01551-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Marshall v. RN/BC

Case Details

Full title:George Lee Marshall Jr., Plaintiff, v. RN/BC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01551-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)