From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Ricolcol

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 3, 2024
5:24-cv-00885-AB (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00885-AB (DTB)

12-03-2024

JENNIFER MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. RICOLCOL, Warden, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ANDRE BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Ricolcol

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 3, 2024
5:24-cv-00885-AB (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Marshall v. Ricolcol

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. RICOLCOL, Warden, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 3, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-00885-AB (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024)