From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2021
CIVIL 3:21-cv-1554 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21-cv-1554

12-14-2021

DWIGHT MARSHALL, Petitioner v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Respondents


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2021, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

2. No certificate of appealability shall issue, as Petitioner has failed to demonstrate “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

3. Petitioner's motion (Doc. 10) for appointment of counsel is DISMISSED as moot.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2021
CIVIL 3:21-cv-1554 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Marshall v. Ransom

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT MARSHALL, Petitioner v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 3:21-cv-1554 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2021)