From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Marshall

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77980

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY HONORABLE SAMUEL J. HAIS.

James R. Hanlin, Clayton, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Benoit, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Archie Marshall (Husband), appeals the judgment and decree of dissolution of his marriage to Beverly Marshall (Wife). He contends the trial court erred in awarding Wife maintenance and partial attorney fees. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Marshall v. Marshall

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Marshall v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE MARSHALL, Appellant, v. BEVERLY MARSHALL, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)