From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Lundy

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 11, 2024
2:24-cv-00411-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00411-VBF-SHK

12-11-2024

NICKOLAS HIAWATHA MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. LEANNA LUNDY, Acting Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED and that Judgment be entered DISMISSING this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Lundy

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 11, 2024
2:24-cv-00411-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Marshall v. Lundy

Case Details

Full title:NICKOLAS HIAWATHA MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. LEANNA LUNDY, Acting Warden…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 11, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00411-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2024)