From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Hurst

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 10, 2007
CASE NO. 07-3043-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 10, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07-3043-SAC.

December 10, 2007


ORDER


On October 2, 2007, this court entered an Order assessing an initial partial filing fee in this action and granting plaintiff thirty days in which to submit the part fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff was notified that failure to pay the partial fee as required in that order could result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff has not responded to that Order and has not paid the assessed fee in the time allotted. The court's mail to plaintiff has been returned and it appears plaintiff has been released from prison and not provided the court with notice of his change of address. The court finds this action should be dismissed for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee as ordered, and on account of plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without prejudice, and all relief is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Hurst

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 10, 2007
CASE NO. 07-3043-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Marshall v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:TERNELL MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD HURST, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 07-3043-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 10, 2007)