distinguishing Bullcoming, where testifying witness had no connection with a particular laboratory report, in a scenario where the testifying witness had supervised the performance of tests, reviewed the analysts' work, and certified the laboratory report
Summary of this case from State v. SmithNo. 13–7768.
05-27-2014
Dina MARSHALL, petitioner, v. COLORADO.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.
distinguishing Bullcoming, where testifying witness had no connection with a particular laboratory report, in a scenario where the testifying witness had supervised the performance of tests, reviewed the analysts' work, and certified the laboratory report
Summary of this case from State v. SmithFull title:Dina MARSHALL, petitioner, v. COLORADO.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: May 27, 2014
See , e.g. , United States v. Summers , 666 F.3d 192, 200, 203 (4th Cir. 2011) ; Marshall v. People , 309…
State v. Smith9, 2013), cert. denied sub nom. Marshall v. Colorado, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2661, 189 L.Ed.2d 212 (2014)…