From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Auburn N. Elec. R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1908
123 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

January, 1908.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented in a memorandum, and Williams, J., who dissented.


I dissent upon the ground that the omission by the defendant to erect a barrier such as would prevent a runaway horse from running upon and over the portion of the street in question did not establish negligence upon the part of the defendant; that the barrier contemplated in the franchise was such as would warn persons driving upon the street in question, rather than protect them from any accident resulting from the occupation of such street.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Auburn N. Elec. R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1908
123 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Marshall v. Auburn N. Elec. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN S. MARSHALL, Respondent, v . AUBURN AND NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILROAD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1908

Citations

123 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)