Opinion
Civil Action 21-4336
04-04-2022
DOUGLAS MARSHALL, et al., Plaintiffs v. PETER C. AMUSO, et al., Defendants
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, United states District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th of April, 2022, upon consideration of the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 43), Plaintiffs' response in opposition (Doc. No. 55), Defendants' reply (Doc. No. 58), this Court having held oral argument on February 2, 2022, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' claims against the individual defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED as duplicative;
2. Plaintiffs' claims against Mr. Pallotta, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Sanderson are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. The remainder of the motion to dismiss is DENIED.