From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Amherst Cnty. Circuit Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Mar 28, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00057 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00057

03-28-2016

EDWARD LEROY MARSHALL, JR., Plaintiff, v. AMHERST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Edward Leroy Marshall, Jr., a Virginia pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 naming the Amherst County Circuit Court as the sole defendant. Plaintiff notes that he is a defendant in on-going criminal proceedings in that state court, and he asks me to order the state court to change venue, appoint "a new and effective" counsel, and seat a "fully-integrated" jury.

Federal courts must not interfere with pending state criminal proceedings absent extraordinary circumstances, which are not present here. See, e.g., Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 44 (1971); Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U.S. 148, 169-70 (1898); Taylor v. Taintor, 83 U.S. 366, 370 (1873). A federal district court should abstain from constitutional challenges to state judicial proceedings, regardless of a claim's merits, if the federal claims could be presented in the ongoing state judicial proceeding. Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. v. Gilchrist, 887 F.2d 49, 52-53 (4th Cir. 1989). Furthermore, the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, expressly prohibits a federal court from enjoining the proceedings from which Plaintiff seeks relief. Moreover, a federal court lack jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials or state agencies. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). "Congress and the federal courts have consistently recognized that federal courts should permit state courts to try state cases, and that, where constitutional issues arise, state court judges are fully competent to handle them subject to Supreme Court review." Bonner v. Circuit Court of St. Louis, 526 F.2d 1331, 1336 (8th Cir. 1975) (en banc). Accordingly, I find it is more appropriate for state courts to adjudicate Plaintiff's claims, and I dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

ENTER: This 28th day of March, 2016.

/s/_________

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marshall v. Amherst Cnty. Circuit Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Mar 28, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00057 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Marshall v. Amherst Cnty. Circuit Court

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LEROY MARSHALL, JR., Plaintiff, v. AMHERST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00057 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2016)