From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsha S. v. Troy R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2022
203 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15517 Dkt. No. F-363-05/19B Case No. 2020–04575

03-15-2022

In the Matter of MARSHA S., Petitioner–Appellant, v. TROY R., Respondent–Respondent.

Howard J. Pobiner, White Plains, for appellant.


Howard J. Pobiner, White Plains, for appellant.

Gische, J.P., Kern, Gonza´lez, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about October 26, 2020, which denied petitioner's objection to an order, same court (Paul Ryneski, Support Magistrate), entered on or about June 15, 2020, dismissing her petition to vacate two orders that suspended the father's child support obligation and for an award of retroactive support for the period from May 14, 2004 to October 2, 2018, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner is precluded from relitigating her entitlement to child support for the retroactive period, as her petition is premised on arguments previously raised and rejected on their merits in the prior proceeding that she commenced in Westchester County, in which she also sought retroactive child support (see Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 N.Y.2d 343, 349, 690 N.Y.S.2d 478, 712 N.E.2d 647 [1999] ). In light of our determination, we need not reach petitioner's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

Marsha S. v. Troy R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2022
203 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Marsha S. v. Troy R.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARSHA S., Petitioner–Appellant, v. TROY R.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
203 A.D.3d 526

Citing Cases

Rachel R. v. Michael F.

The court correctly determined that the mother was precluded from relitigating her claim for child support…

Rachel R. v. Michael F.

The court correctly determined that the mother was precluded from relitigating her claim for child support…