From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. Tin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. CV 10-03430 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-03430 LHK

10-31-2011

ROBIN MARSH, Plaintiff, v. TIN, INC. dba Temple Inland, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, QUALITY CARRIERS, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Defendants.

ANTHONY BOSKOVICH Attorney for Plaintiff ADAM FRIEDENBERG Attorney for Defendant


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION AND PROPOSED ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that the entire action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1). Each side shall bear its own attorney's fee and costs.

ANTHONY BOSKOVICH

Attorney for Plaintiff

ADAM FRIEDENBERG

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the entire action is dismissed with prejudice. Each side shall bear its own attorney's fee and costs. The clerk shall close the file.

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH


Summaries of

Marsh v. Tin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. CV 10-03430 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Marsh v. Tin, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN MARSH, Plaintiff, v. TIN, INC. dba Temple Inland, Inc., a Delaware…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 10-03430 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)