From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. Grist

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1868
62 N.C. 349 (N.C. 1868)

Opinion

(January Term, 1868.)

Courts of equity are not bound by the statute allowing executors and administrators nine months to plead.

CREDITORS' BILL, filed to Spring Term, 1867, of BEAUFORT. The defendant, having been appointed administrator in the preceding month of March, moved that he be allowed nine months to plead. Mitchell, J., overruled the motion, and no answer being put in, rendered a (350) decree pro confesso. Whereupon the defendant appealed. No further statement is necessary.

Fowle Badger, for the appellant.

Rodman and Carter, contra.


The statute allowing executors and administrators nine months to plead, does not apply to Courts of Equity. "Statutes which confer rights or regulate contracts must be observed by all courts, but those which regulate matters of practice or the course of proceeding have never been considered as applying to Courts of Equity unless specially mentioned. The reason is, that those courts have peculiar jurisdiction and a course of proceeding subject to be modified by the Chancellor to suit the justice of each case." Sandridge v. Spurgen, 37 N.C. 269.

There is no error. The defendant must pay the costs of this court.

PER CURIAM. Decree accordingly.

(351)


Summaries of

Marsh v. Grist

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1868
62 N.C. 349 (N.C. 1868)
Case details for

Marsh v. Grist

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD S. MARSH for himself and others v. JAMES R. GRIST, Adm'r of Allen…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1868

Citations

62 N.C. 349 (N.C. 1868)

Citing Cases

Sandridge v. Spurgen

PER CURIAM. Ordered accordingly. Cited: Marsh v. Grist, 62 N.C. 350.…