From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 15, 2023
2:23-CV-0877-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0877-DMC-P

08-15-2023

JEFFREY PAUL MARSH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion, ECF No. 16, for an extension of time to file a traverse. Good cause appearing therefor based on counsel's declaration indicating that the request is unopposed, Petitioner's motion will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 16, is GRANTED.
2. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Marsh v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 15, 2023
2:23-CV-0877-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Marsh v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY PAUL MARSH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 15, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0877-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2023)