From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Teros Advisors, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
4:20-cv-02679-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-cv-02679-HSG

07-06-2021

MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. TEROS ADVISORS, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant. TEROS ADVISORS, LLC, a California limited liability company, Counter-Claimant, v. MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counter-Defendant.

Lawrence Hecimovich Attorneys for TEROS ADVISORS, LLC


MMA Complaint Filed: April 17, 2020

Trial Dated: TBD

Lawrence Hecimovich Attorneys for TEROS ADVISORS, LLC

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND ORDER DENYING TO CHANGE DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

1. On February 11, 2021, Defendant Teros Advisors, LLC's filed its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Teros set that motion for the earliest possible date on the Court's Calendar, June 3, 2021.
2. The court heard Defendant's motion on June 3, 2021. The Court appeared to indicate that it intended to grant Defendant judgment as to part or all of Plaintiff s Complaint.
3. The court has not yet ruled on the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
4. The last day to file motions for summary judgment is currently set for July 8, 2021.
5. Defendant respectfully requests that the Court change the dipositive motion filing deadline to thirty (30) days after the Court rules on Defendant's motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, which was heard on June 3, 2021.
6. Defendant has not previously asked the Court to change this deadline.
7. This change is necessary because Defendant is unable to frame its motion for summary judgment in such a way as to avoid unnecessary pleading and argument.
8. Changing the dispositive motion cut-off will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as the pre-trial conference is not set until November 2, 2021.
9. The opposing side has not agreed. I tried to obtain the opposing party's agreement to this change.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true and correct.
The motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Teros Advisors, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
4:20-cv-02679-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Teros Advisors, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

4:20-cv-02679-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)