From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marse v. Red Frog Events, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17-01402-BAJ-EWD (M.D. La. Aug. 17, 2018)

Summary

finding that allegation that plaintiff suffered a broken femur, without more information, was insufficient to meet amount in controversy and remanding case

Summary of this case from Woods v. Arch Ins. Co.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17-01402-BAJ-EWD

08-17-2018

GEORGE MARSE, ET AL v. RED FROG EVENTS, LLC, ET AL


RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge sua sponte recommends that this case be remanded for failure to establish the amount in controversy. (Doc. 45). The Magistrate Judge further recommends denying as moot Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand for improper joinder. Id.

The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days from the date they received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 45). Defendant Red Frog Events filed an objection. (Docs. 46). Having carefully considered the underlying matter, and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Red Frog argues that the amount in controversy is met. (Doc. 46 at p. 1). Alternatively, Red Frog asks for limited jurisdictional discovery. The Court declines to permit jurisdictional discovery at this stage, for the reasons outlined by the Magistrate Judge in another Red Frog case. Sampson v. Red Frog, 17-CV-1671 (M.D. La. Aug. 14, 2018), ECF No. 75. --------

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 45), is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the 20th Judicial District Court for the Parish of West Feliciana, State of Louisiana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (Doc. 14) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 17th day of August, 2018.

/s/ _________

BRIAN A. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Marse v. Red Frog Events, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17-01402-BAJ-EWD (M.D. La. Aug. 17, 2018)

finding that allegation that plaintiff suffered a broken femur, without more information, was insufficient to meet amount in controversy and remanding case

Summary of this case from Woods v. Arch Ins. Co.
Case details for

Marse v. Red Frog Events, LLC

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE MARSE, ET AL v. RED FROG EVENTS, LLC, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 17, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17-01402-BAJ-EWD (M.D. La. Aug. 17, 2018)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Arch Ins. Co.

R. Doc. 5. See, e.g., Marse v. Red Frog Events, LLC, No. CV 17-1402-BAJ-EWD, 2018 WL 3966975, *3 (July 20,…