From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrick v. Furnari

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 22, 1925
211 N.W. 667 (Mich. 1925)

Opinion

Docket No. 46.

Submitted October 9, 1925.

Decided December 22, 1925. Resubmitted October 20, 1926. Former opinion vacated January 3, 1927.

Appeal from Wayne; Marschner (Adolph F.), J. Submitted October 9, 1925. (Docket No. 46.) Decided December 22, 1925. Resubmitted October 20, 1926. Former opinion vacated January 3, 1927.

Bill by Louis Marrick and others against Joseph Furnari and another to restrain the violation of building restrictions. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Harold F. Coyle ( George W. Moore, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Groesbeck, Sempliner, Kelly Baillie and Rhodes, Garvett Frankel ( A.C. Stellwagen and Frank D. Eaman, of counsel), for defendants.


ON REHEARING.


The facts are stated sufficiently in Marrick v. Furnari, 233 Mich. 146. The case is ruled by Goldstick v. Thomas, ante, 236.

Accordingly, the decree of the trial court, dismissing the bill, is affirmed, with costs to appellees.

SHARPE, C.J., and BIRD, SNOW, STEERE, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred.

Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

Marrick v. Furnari

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 22, 1925
211 N.W. 667 (Mich. 1925)
Case details for

Marrick v. Furnari

Case Details

Full title:MARRICK v. FURNARI

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 22, 1925

Citations

211 N.W. 667 (Mich. 1925)
211 N.W. 667

Citing Cases

Weld v. Bjork

Where an owner has acquired a plot comprising more than one contiguous lot and seeks to build in such a…

Kalisch v. Sapperstein

" The learned trial judge evidently relied on the holding in Marick v. Furnari, 233 Mich. 146. Upon rehearing…