From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 31, 2001
803 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-2137

Opinion filed October 31, 2001.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Maria E. Dennis, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 91-1881.

Fernando Marrero, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and SORONDO, JJ.

ON MOTION TO PASS UPON A QUESTION CERTIFIED TO BE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE


We grant the motion. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Motion granted; question certified.


Summaries of

Marrero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 31, 2001
803 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Marrero v. State

Case Details

Full title:FERNANDO MARRERO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 31, 2001

Citations

803 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)