From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrero v. Billy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No. CIV-08-431-FHS-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-431-FHS-SPS

01-17-2012

CASTANO MARRERO, Plaintiff, v. SGT. JAMES BILLY, et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION

BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT

The Court has been advised by counsel that this action has been settled, or is in the process of being settled. Therefore, it is not necessary that the action remain upon the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.

__________

Frank H. Seay

United States District Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Marrero v. Billy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No. CIV-08-431-FHS-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Marrero v. Billy

Case Details

Full title:CASTANO MARRERO, Plaintiff, v. SGT. JAMES BILLY, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-431-FHS-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2012)