From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marr v. Fla. Bar

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 15, 2014
143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–1464.

2014-04-15

Timothy A. MARR, Petitioner(s) v. THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent(s).


Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directed to The Florida Bar, the petition is hereby dismissed pursuant to Tyson v. Fla. Bar, 826 So.2d 265, 268 (Fla.2002). To the extent petitioner also seeks to challenge his conviction and sentence, the petition is hereby denied as procedurally barred. A petition for extraordinary relief is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings. See Denson v. State, 775 So.2d 288, 290 (Fla.2000); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla.1992).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marr v. Fla. Bar

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 15, 2014
143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Marr v. Fla. Bar

Case Details

Full title:Timothy A. MARR, Petitioner(s) v. THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 15, 2014

Citations

143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fla. Bar

AFFIRMED. See Marr v. The Florida Bar, 143 So.3d 920 (Fla.2014) ; Osterback v. The Florida Bar, 135 So.3d 288…