From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marquez v. Teufel Holly Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 16, 2023
3:22-cv-00060-SB (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00060-SB

02-16-2023

RAMIRO ALONSO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. TEUFEL HOLLY FARMS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on December 29, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court deny Teufel's motion to compel arbitration. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [13] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marquez v. Teufel Holly Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 16, 2023
3:22-cv-00060-SB (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Marquez v. Teufel Holly Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAMIRO ALONSO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. TEUFEL HOLLY FARMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 16, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00060-SB (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2023)

Citing Cases

Nw. Inv. Holdings v. Pacwest Funding, Inc.

“‘[F]or purposes of deciding a motion to compel arbitration under the FAA, a district court may consider…