From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marquez-Ortiz v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 13, 2022
20-CV-5793 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-5793 (JPO)

10-13-2022

JERYLAN MARQUEZ-ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff appeals the September 26, 2022 order issued by Magistrate Judge Lehrburger denying his request for a conference in advance of making a motion for spoliation. (Dkt. Nos. 77, 78.) A district court will set aside a magistrate judge's decision on a non-dispositive matter only where it is “clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). Having reviewed Judge Lehrburger's order and the parties' submissions, the Court finds no error, clear or otherwise, and concludes that the order is consistent with the law. The order is therefore affirmed.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marquez-Ortiz v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 13, 2022
20-CV-5793 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Marquez-Ortiz v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JERYLAN MARQUEZ-ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

20-CV-5793 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)