From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marozas v. City of Burbank

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jul 3, 2002
No. 02 C 3595 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 3, 2002)

Opinion

No. 02 C 3595

July 3, 2002


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Even though all five defendants in this Title VII case — City of Burbank and four of its Police Department's high level officers — are represented by the same law firm, counsel has needlessly filed a separate Answer for each defendant. Quite apart from the inattention to the environment evidenced by killing so many more trees than is reasonably required (why spend more than 70 pages in reproducing each set of the multiple answers, when about a fifth of that would do the job?), that places an inordinate burden on the reader in ascertaining the respects in which the defendants share common cause, as contrasted with the areas (if any) in which they part company.

It is not at all difficult — and, as already indicated, it would be a courtesy to opposing counsel and to the Court — for defense counsel to prepare and file a single answer on behalf of all five defendants, collectivizing their responses where appropriate and distinguishing among their individual answers where necessary. Accordingly this Court sua sponte strikes the existing answers from the file physically (thus eliminating wholly needless bulk) and grants leave to defendants to file a single collective Answer on or before July 17, 2002.


Summaries of

Marozas v. City of Burbank

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jul 3, 2002
No. 02 C 3595 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 3, 2002)
Case details for

Marozas v. City of Burbank

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MAROZAS, Plaintiff v. CITY OF BURBANK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 3, 2002

Citations

No. 02 C 3595 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 3, 2002)