From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marotta v. Rood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1978
65 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

November 27, 1978


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 12, 1978, which granted defendants' motion to direct her to submit to a physical examination. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on condition that defense counsel pay plaintiff the sum of $250 within 20 days after service upon defendants of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof; in the event such condition is not complied with, order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by defendants after payment of the $250, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. In the interest of justice, defendants should be permitted to conduct a physical examination of plaintiff. No prejudice to plaintiff has been shown. However, because defendants' failure to conduct an examination heretofore was caused by the apparent neglect of their counsel, which was not adequately explained, this affirmance is conditioned on the payment of $250 (see Gaffney v Salenger, 40 A.D.2d 849). Latham, J.P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marotta v. Rood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1978
65 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Marotta v. Rood

Case Details

Full title:EUGENIA J. MAROTTA, Appellant, v. MARILYN A. ROOD et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Dehaney v. N.Y.C. Tr. Auth

Plaintiffs' request for attorneys fees is therefore granted. See Garfield v. Done Fashion, Inc., 227 A.D.2d…

Carrano v. Mistratta

In the interest of justice, and in the absence of prejudice to plaintiffs, the motion has been conditionally…