From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marone v. Marone

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 24, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-24-2017

Robert J. MARONE, respondent, v. Francesca MARONE, appellant.

KasniaLaw, PLLC, Poughkeepsie, NY (Cynthia G. Kasnia of counsel), for appellant.


KasniaLaw, PLLC, Poughkeepsie, NY (Cynthia G. Kasnia of counsel), for appellant.

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 9 to partition real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated October 6, 2015, which granted the plaintiff's motion for an award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $6,000, payable from the net proceeds of the sale of the real property.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"[P]artition, although statutory (see RPAPL 9), is equitable in nature, and the court may compel the parties to do equity between themselves when adjusting the distribution of the proceeds of a sale" (Koniosis v. Tsororos, 83 A.D.3d 665, 668, 920 N.Y.S.2d 403 ). In this case, the attorney's fee award in the sum of $6,000, payable from the net proceeds of the sale of the real property at issue, was equitable and reasonable.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marone v. Marone

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 24, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Marone v. Marone

Case Details

Full title:Robert J. MARONE, respondent, v. Francesca MARONE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
150 A.D.3d 1097