From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marnhout v. Aspenbio Pharma, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Case No. 11-cv-00165-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 11-cv-00165-REB-KMT

09-16-2011

MIKE MARNHOUT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SHAZI IQBAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and JOHN WOLFE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASPENBIO PHARMA, INC., a Colorado corporation, RICHARD G. DONNELLY, GREGORY PUSEY, JEFFREY G. McGONEGAL, MARK COLGIN, and ROBERT CASPARI, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Joint Motion To (1) Vacate The Court's "Second Order Re: Motions For Class Certification" and (2) Confirm The February 1, 2011 Scheduling Order [#37] filed September 15, 2011. After reviewing the motion and file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and a new class certification schedule should be followed.

"[#37]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Joint Motion To (1) Vacate The Court's "Second Order Re: Motions For Class Certification" and (2) Confirm The February 1, 2011 Scheduling Order [#37] filed September 15, 2011, is GRANTED;

2. That the Second Order Re: Motions For Class Certification [#34] entered August 25, 2011, is VACATED; and

3. That the court approves, adopts, incorporates, and orders implemented the schedule set forth in the joint motion of the parties and the Order Re Schedule [#14] entered February 1, 2011, modified as follows:

(a) a defendant shall file any motion to dismiss by October 7, 2011, whic is 45 days after the filing of the amended complaint;

(b) the lead plaintiff shall respond to any motion to dismiss by November 21, 2011;

(c) a defendant may file a reply, if any, by December 12, 2011 ; and

(d) the lead plaintiff shall file his motion for class certification within thirty (30) days of any order denying the defendants' motion(s) to dismiss, or the date that defendants file an answer, whichever is later.

Dated September 16, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marnhout v. Aspenbio Pharma, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Case No. 11-cv-00165-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Marnhout v. Aspenbio Pharma, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MIKE MARNHOUT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

Civil Case No. 11-cv-00165-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)