From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlowe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 24, 2001
797 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D00-1857.

October 24, 2001.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Victoria S. Sigler, Judge.

Marvin D. Wilson, Sr., Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the order denying the motion for postconviction relief filed by defendant-appellant Richard Marlowe. We concur with the trial court that the affidavits relied on by the defendant do not qualify as newly discovered evidence. We note that at the time the defendant entered his pleas, the defendant admitted not once, but twice, that he had committed the charged crimes. Further, as noted by the trial court, the affidavits do not actually exculpate defendant from culpability in the charged crimes. Finally, the affidavits relied on by the defendant apply to only one of the two cases on which he entered his pleas. We find no error in the order denying postconviction relief.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Marlowe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 24, 2001
797 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Marlowe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard MARLOWE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 24, 2001

Citations

797 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Marlowe v. State

PER CURIAM. These are further proceedings in Marlowe v. State, 797 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). When the…