From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlin v. Raper

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Mar 13, 2007
Case No. 2:06CV0004 SWW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2007)

Summary

stating "lack of special facilities for temporarily wheelchair-bound inmates do not objectively constitute serious deprivation"

Summary of this case from Sepulveda v. Galindo

Opinion

Case No. 2:06CV0004 SWW/BD.

March 13, 2007


ORDER


The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Complaint (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the dismissal will count as a "strike" against plaintiffs under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marlin v. Raper

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Mar 13, 2007
Case No. 2:06CV0004 SWW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2007)

stating "lack of special facilities for temporarily wheelchair-bound inmates do not objectively constitute serious deprivation"

Summary of this case from Sepulveda v. Galindo
Case details for

Marlin v. Raper

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DUANE MARLIN Reg. # 08387-003 Plaintiff v. EDWARD RAPER, et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:06CV0004 SWW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Trevino v. Woodbury Cnty. Jail

For this reason, federal courts have held that Congress did not intend to authorize actions against federal…

Sepulveda v. Galindo

Such brief deprivations do not amount to a denial of the “minimal civilized measure of life's necessities.”…