From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlin v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2008
No. 2:05-cv-02043-JKS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-02043-JKS-JFM.

January 9, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 23, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the Findings and Recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 23, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's motion for a stay of these proceedings at Docket No. 7 is DENIED; and

3. Petitioner is directed to file his traverse, if any, to Respondent's answer within 20 days of service of this order.


Summaries of

Marlin v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2008
No. 2:05-cv-02043-JKS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Marlin v. Prosper

Case Details

Full title:TERRY LEE MARLIN, Petitioner, v. KATHY PROSPER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-02043-JKS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2008)