Opinion
Case No. C07-5371RBL.
November 1, 2007
ORDER
This Bivens action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4.
Mr. Marks now litigates under a sanction as a result of improper filings. As part of that sanction documents filed by Mr. Marks are submitted under seal for court review. Mr. Marks has filed four documents since entry of the last order (Dkt. # 11, 13, 14, and 15). (Dkt. #11) is an "amended" motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court orders the document UNSEALED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been denied (Dkt # 12).
The next document is a "notice" to the court (Dkt. # 13). The facts alleged in this pleading have no connection to the complaint. Further, the court does not conduct business based on pleadings of this nature. The court orders the document UNSEALED, but no further action will be taken on this pleading.
(Dkt. # 14 and 15) are motion for reconsideration of the motion to deny in forma pauperis status. The court orders the documents UNSEALED. The motions have been denied (Dkt # 16).
Judge Leighton's October 1, 2007, order gave plaintiff until November 1, 2007, to pay the filing fee. That order states if the fee is not paid this matter should be dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. # 12).
The clerk's office is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff.