From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. Tower Cleaners

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2008
303 F. App'x 391 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-17167.

Submitted December 1, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 10, 2008.

Chester Lee Marks, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01383-FJM.

Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and appellant's opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Marks v. Tower Cleaners

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2008
303 F. App'x 391 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Marks v. Tower Cleaners

Case Details

Full title:Chester Lee MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWER CLEANERS; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2008

Citations

303 F. App'x 391 (9th Cir. 2008)