Opinion
2:18-cv-01421-RFB-BNW
08-18-2023
Louis Marks, Plaintiff, v. State of Nevada, et al., Defendants.
Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., Daniel R. Brady, Esq. PISANELLI BICE PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Marks Chris Davis Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General Attorney for Defendant Vincent Lorenz
Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., Daniel R. Brady, Esq. PISANELLI BICE PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Marks
Chris Davis Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General Attorney for Defendant Vincent Lorenz
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.6, and Local Rule 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Louis Marks (“Marks”), by and through his attorneys of record, Todd L. Bice, Esq., Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., and Daniel R. Brady, Esq., of Pisanelli Bice PLLC, and Defendant Vincent Lorenz (“Lorenz”), by and through his attorney of record, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Chris Davis, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Motion to Amend,” ECF No. 72), by fourteen (14) days, from August 17, 2023, to August 31, 2023. The stipulation is entered in good faith, and not for purposes of delay, as counsel for Defendant needs additional time to address the motion to amend, as the amended complaint adds four causes of action and five (5) defendants.
Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, by fourteen (14) days, from August 17, 2023, to August 31, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.