From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. Diesenhouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1989
146 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree that the plaintiffs have failed to state any cause of action against the defendants Victus Ltd., The Union Savings Bank and Hampton Vistas Associates. In light of the fact that the plaintiffs have never offered any facts in support of their claim that those defendants "entered into a conspiracy and scheme to defraud" them, the failure to grant the plaintiffs leave to replead with respect to those defendants was not an abuse of discretion. Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marks v. Diesenhouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1989
146 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Marks v. Diesenhouse

Case Details

Full title:GERALD R. MARKS, Individually and on Behalf of S.D. DEVELOPERS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Marks v. Diesenhouse

Decided July 13, 1989 Appeal from (2d dept: 146 A.D.2d 752) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…