From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mark v. Judd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 14, 2014
169 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D14–3947.

11-14-2014

David Allen MARK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady JUDD, State Of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


AMENDED ORDER

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted. Within three business days following the issuance of this order, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine conditions of pretrial release pursuant to rule 3.131. See Miller v. State, 980 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). This order does not preclude the State from filing a legally sufficient motion for pretrial detention under rule 3.132(b). If the State files a legally sufficient motion and shows beyond a reasonable doubt the need for pretrial detention pursuant to the criteria in section 907.041, Florida Statutes, the trial court shall include the findings required by rule 3.132(c)(2) and section 907.041(4)(i) in its order. Notably, the State conceded that the petition should be granted because the trial court failed to make the findings required by section 907.041(4)(c)(7).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mark v. Judd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 14, 2014
169 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Mark v. Judd

Case Details

Full title:David Allen MARK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady JUDD, State Of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Nov 14, 2014

Citations

169 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)