From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mark Barrett v. Brian Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 2009
58 A.D.3d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 504372.

January 22, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Mark Barrett, New York City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Spain, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating frisk procedures, refusing a direct order, interfering with an employee, assaulting a staff member and engaging in violent conduct. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a second misbehavior report with possessing a document depicting diagrams of portions of the facility. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. Upon administrative appeal, that determination was modified by dismissing only the facility document charge set forth in the second misbehavior report. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment of the determination.

We confirm. The first misbehavior report, together with testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Triplett v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1075, 1076). Petitioner's denial of the allegations and offering of a retaliation defense created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Sloane v McKinney, 48 AD3d 850, 850). Regarding petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination flowed from any purported bias ( see Matter of Sweat v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1142, 1143). The remaining claims advanced by petitioner have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Mark Barrett v. Brian Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 2009
58 A.D.3d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Mark Barrett v. Brian Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARK BARRETT, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 274
870 N.Y.S.2d 808

Citing Cases

In re Harry West

The misbehavior report, as well as the hearing testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident,…

Douglas v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officers who investigated the incident and testimony of…