Opinion
Nos. 16679-16681, 16685.
Argued April 4, 1968.
Decided May 10, 1968.
Marvin Schwartz, Schwartz O'Connell, New York City (Wilderman, Markowitz Kirschner, Richard H. Markowitz, Richard Kirschner, Philadelphia, Pa., Burton Epstein, New York City, on the brief), for appellants in Nos. 16679, 16680, 16681 and for appellees in No. 16685.
Eugene R. Lippman, Krusen, Evans Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Joseph M. Gindhart, Philadelphia, Pa., Albert E. Rice, New York City, on the brief), for appellants in No. 16685 and for appellee in No. 16681.
Morton M. Maneker, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, New York City (Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Edward Silver, Randall M. Odza, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees in Nos. 16679 and 16680.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Events which have transpired since the entry of the Orders appealed from at Appeals Nos. 16679, 16680 and 16685 establish beyond question that the questions they present have become moot and these appeals will be dismissed for that reason.
The Appeal at No. 16681 is from the entry of an Order which is clearly interlocutory and it will be dismissed for the reason that it is not an appealable Order.