Contrary to the mother's contention, a separate dispositional hearing was not required before revoking a suspended judgment and terminating her parental rights where the record demonstrates that it was in the child's best interests (see Family Ct. Act ยง 633[f] ; Matter of Marish G. [Maria E.G.], 215 A.D.3d 966, 967, 188 N.Y.S.3d 119 [2d Dept. 2023] ; Matter of Jerimiah H. [Kiarra M.], 213 A.D.3d 1298, 1299, 183 N.Y.S.3d 654 [4th Dept. 2023], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 913, 2023 WL 3513087 [2023] ; Matter of Nahlaya MM. [Zaianna LL.], 193 A.D.3d at 1298, 147 N.Y.S.3d 213 ; compareMatter of Harmony F. [William F.], 212 A.D.3d 1028, 1033, 181 N.Y.S.3d 403 [3d Dept. 2023] ). To that end, although "a parent's failure to comply with the [terms and] conditions of a suspended judgment does not automatically compel termination of parental rights, that noncompliance constitutes strong evidence that termination is, in fact, in the best interests of the child" ( Matter of Maykayla FF. [Eugene FF.], 141 A.D.3d 898, 900, 34 N.Y.S.3d 777 [3d Dept. 2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).
"The Family Court may revoke a suspended judgment after a violation hearing if it finds, upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the parent failed to comply with one or more of its conditions" (Matter of Jahshanty L.C. [Ann-Marie N.M.], 179 A.D.3d 672, 672). "When determining compliance with a suspended judgment, it is the parent's obligation to demonstrate that progress has been made to overcome the specific problems which led to the removal" of the child" (Matter of Marish G. [Maria E.G.], 215 A.D.3d 966, 966). "[A] parent's attempt to comply with the literal provisions of the suspended judgment is not enough" (Matter of Deysanni H. [Deysanna H.], 156 A.D.3d 699, 700).