From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marion v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
Civil No. 2:12-CV-13127 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:12-CV-13127

06-11-2018

ALLEN MARION, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY WOODS, Respondent


OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING THE RULE 60(B) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT [DKT. # 52] TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

This Court granted Petitioner a conditional writ of habeas corpus, holding that Petitioner was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because his attorney failed to investigate and present an alibi defense. Marion v. Woods, 128 F Supp. 3d 987 (E.D. Mich. 2015). The Sixth Circuit reversed the decision. Marion v. Woods, 663 F. App'x. 378 (6th Cir. 2016); cert. den. 137 S. Ct. 2291 (2017).

Petitioner filed a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Petitioner alleges that the Michigan Assistant Attorney General committed a fraud upon the court before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit during the appeal of this Court's decision to grant habeas relief. Petitioner specifically alleges that the Assistant Attorney General mislead the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals by concealing or withholding an affidavit that Petitioner supplied to this Court and to the state courts which supported his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Petitioner argues that had this affidavit not been concealed by the Assistant Attorney General, the Sixth Circuit would have affirmed the decision to grant habeas relief.

"A motion brought pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from a court order should be addressed to the court which entered the order." Porcelli v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 78 F.R.D. 499, 500 (E.D. Wis. 1978), aff'd sub nom. Porcelli v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co., 588 F.2d 838 (7th Cir. 1978). Petitioner moved for relief from judgment based on an alleged fraud committed upon the Sixth Circuit; this Court is not the proper forum for the Rule 60(b) motion. Id.

A district court has the discretion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, to transfer a case improperly filed in the district, in the interests of justice, to the proper court where the case or motion could have been filed. The Court orders the Clerk of the Court to transfer the motion for relief from judgment to the Sixth Circuit.

The Court ORDERS that:

The Clerk of the Court shall transfer The Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment [Dkt. # 52] to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 11, 2018


Summaries of

Marion v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
Civil No. 2:12-CV-13127 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Marion v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN MARION, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY WOODS, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 2:12-CV-13127 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2018)