From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 30, 2022
No. 8145-20W (U.S.T.C. Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

8145-20W

03-30-2022

Herman J. Marino Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

By opinion issued January 11, 2022, in the case of Li v. Commissioner, 22 F.4th 1014 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 11, 2022), the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction of whistleblower cases involving threshold rejections of claims for whistleblower award. That ruling is not yet final. More recently, the court of appeals has been asked to consider whether this Court also lacks jurisdiction in cases involving denials of claims for whistleblower award where no proceeds have been collected based on the whistleblower's information. See Kennedy v. Commissioner, No. 211133 (D.C. Cir.). Because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals' rulings in these cases potentially affect our jurisdiction in this case, it is

ORDERED that the proceedings in this case are stayed. It is further

ORDERED that all pending motions, if any, will be held in abeyance. It is further

ORDERED that, although these proceedings are stayed, on or before September 26, 2022, the parties shall file status reports (preferably a joint report) concerning the then-current status of this case and the above-referenced cases of Li v. Commissioner and Kennedy v. Commissioner.


Summaries of

Marino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 30, 2022
No. 8145-20W (U.S.T.C. Mar. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Marino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Herman J. Marino Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

No. 8145-20W (U.S.T.C. Mar. 30, 2022)