From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marine Midland Tinker Natl. v. Ataipa Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1979
73 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 17, 1979


In an action on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 3, 1979, which denied its motion, pursuant to CPLR 3213, for summary judgment in lieu of complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff is granted. With respect to the enforceability of the promissory note, executed by the defendant Ataipa Construction Corporation on November 13, 1974, and the prior guarantees, we find that there are no triable issues of fact which can defeat the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marine Midland Tinker Natl. v. Ataipa Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1979
73 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Marine Midland Tinker Natl. v. Ataipa Constr

Case Details

Full title:MARINE MIDLAND TINKER NATIONAL BANK, Now Known as MARINE MIDLAND BANK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)