From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marinaro v. Pecoraro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

March, 1923.


These two actions are both so connected and related to the same subject-matter, to wit, the contract for the purchase and sale of real property, that they may be consolidated without prejudice to any substantial right. The object of section 96 of the Civil Practice Act is to liberalize the practice as much as possible and to remove technical restrictions upon the administration of justice. ( Brody v. Madison Lunch, Inc., 199 App. Div. 640; Epstein v. Gluckin, 233 N.Y. 490.) We think these cases fall within the purview of that section. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marinaro v. Pecoraro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Marinaro v. Pecoraro

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. MARINARO, Appellant, v. FILOMENO PECORARO, Respondent. CLEMENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

Water Right Elect. v. Rockland Light Power

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with…

Levy v. Portugal

The subject-matter is so closely connected in both actions that consolidation may be had without prejudice to…