From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 6, 1926
107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Decision Filed February 6, 1926.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that the damages awarded to the defendant's estate are excessive; Louisville N. R. Co. v. Jones, 45 Fla. 407, 34 South. Rep. 246; Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Bowden, 54 Fla. 461, 45 South. Rep. 755; Secs. 4960, 4961, 4964, 4965, Rev. Gen Stats. 1920; it is, therefore, considered ordered and adjudged that if the plaintiff below shall remit $1,000.00 as of the date of the verdict, the judgment shall stand affirmed for the remainder, otherwise, the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Hayes, 67 Fla. 101, 64 South. Rep. 504; 84 Fla. 235, 93 So. 247; 20 Fla. 515.

It is so ordered.

BROWN, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL AND STRUM, J. J., concur.

BUFORD, J., of counsel for Defendant in Error, disqualified.


Summaries of

Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 6, 1926
107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May

Case Details

Full title:MARIANNA BLOUNTSTOWN RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Plaintiff in Error…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 6, 1926

Citations

107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)
107 So. 646