From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Margolis v. Pinnas

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 11, 1924
124 A. 529 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Submitted December 10, 1923 —

Decided April 11, 1924.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 1 N.J. Mis. R. 117.

For the respondents, Benjamin M. Weinberg.

For the appellants, Harry Levin and Milton M. Unger.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Margolis v. Pinnas

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 11, 1924
124 A. 529 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Margolis v. Pinnas

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS MARGOLIS AND HYMAN M. MARGOLIS, RESPONDENTS, v. MAX PINNAS AND SAM…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 11, 1924

Citations

124 A. 529 (N.J. 1924)
124 A. 529

Citing Cases

Theodore the Florist Co. v. D.A. Schulte, Inc.

In the present case, as will appear, the contingencies are fully and openly expressed. My view of Margolies…