ยง

Margoles v. United States

407 F.2d 727 (7th Cir. 1969)
Margoles v. United States

2 Citing cases

  1. U.S. v. Concemi

    957 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1992)   Cited 49 times
    In United States v. Concemi, 957 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1992), defendants were charged with making false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. ยง 1014.

    Although not dispositive on the issue presented here, those cases are instructive. In United States v. Perrotta, 553 F.2d 247 (1st Cir. 1977), we adopted the standard annunciated in Margoles v. United States, 407 F.2d 727 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 833, 90 S.Ct. 89, 24 L.Ed.2d 84 (1969): [W]here prejudicial publicity is brought to the court's attention during a trial . . . the court must ascertain if any jurors who had been exposed to such publicity had read or heard the same.

  2. United States v. Malsom

    779 F.2d 1228 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 31 times
    Finding specific intent when an export shipper and a friend warned defendant that an export license was required

    "Thomas, 463 F.2d at 1063 ( citing Margoles v. United States, 407 F.2d 727, 733, 735 (7th Cir. 1969)); see also United States v. Wilson, 715 F.2d 1164 (7th Cir. 1983). In this case, the record establishes that the district court frequently warned the jury during the trial that Libya and its activities must not influence the jury's decision.