From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Margaret R.-K. v. Kenneth K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 16, 2016
136 A.D.3d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

248 247.

02-16-2016

In re MARGARET R.-K., Petitioner–Appellant, v. KENNETH K., Respondent–Respondent.

  Law Offices Of Sanford F. Young, P.C., New York (Sanford F. Young of counsel), for appellant. Cheryl S. Solomon, Brooklyn, for respondent. Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), attorney for the child.


Law Offices Of Sanford F. Young, P.C., New York (Sanford F. Young of counsel), for appellant.

Cheryl S. Solomon, Brooklyn, for respondent.

Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), attorney for the child.

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Marva Burnett, Ref.), entered on or about October 15, 2014, which, after a hearing, awarded sole custody and decision-making authority of the subject child to respondent father, with limited visitation to the mother and no provision for vacations and school breaks, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the parental access schedule and remand the matter to the Family Court for reassignment to a different referee, or to a judge, to conduct further proceedings consistent herewith, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Referee, entered on or about August 19, 2011, which temporarily placed the child in the father's care with limited visitation, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The Referee's finding that it was in the child's best interests to award full custody and decision-making to the father is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record, including the parties' testimony (see Matter of Xiomara M. v. Robert M., 102 A.D.3d 581, 582, 958 N.Y.S.2d 391 1st Dept.2013 ).

A new hearing concerning parental access and visitation is required to determine, based on up-to-date information, including an interview of the child, the child's best interests with respect to parental access, and to craft a more detailed and comprehensive schedule in an attempt to avoid further conflict. On remand, the proceedings are to be presided over by a different referee, or a judge, on an expedited basis.

We have considered the mother's remaining contentions, and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Margaret R.-K. v. Kenneth K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 16, 2016
136 A.D.3d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Margaret R.-K. v. Kenneth K.

Case Details

Full title:In re Margaret R.-K., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth K.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 16, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
24 N.Y.S.3d 650
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1132

Citing Cases

Stephanie C. v. Ricardo E.

However, as the parties requested, Family Court should have set forth a more precise schedule for the…

Kimberly J. v. Benjamin G.

We further find that the visitation schedule, which consisted of overnight visits on alternate weekends, was…