From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maresca v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 14, 1938.


Order of the City Court of Yonkers, vacating order requiring security for costs, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Plaintiff's intestate was not a resident of the city of Yonkers, nor is plaintiff such a resident. The specific provision contained in section 1522, Civil Practice Act, is, therefore, applicable irrespective of section 1523, Civil Practice Act, generally relating to legal representatives in their capacity as such and not to the factor of residence. ( Allocio v. Colonial Life Ins. Co., 246 App. Div. 621.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maresca v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Maresca v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MARESCA, as Administrator, etc., of SAMUEL MARESCA, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Slutzky v. Aron Estates Corp.

The New York decisions prior to the CPLR are in conflict on the question whether security for costs are…

Oliva v. D'AMATO

And the text writers were in accord. (11 Carmody on New York Practice, § 361; Milliman on Law of Costs in…