From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mares v. Stainer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2562 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2562 EFB P.

October 19, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Petitioner challenges an administrative determination at Tehachapi State Prison in Kern County and so this action should have been commenced in the district court in Fresno. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d).

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

1. This action is transferred to the district court in Fresno. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.

3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

DATED: October 17, 2011.


Summaries of

Mares v. Stainer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2562 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Mares v. Stainer

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR MARCELINO MARES, Petitioner, v. M. STAINER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2562 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)