Summary
holding that plaintiff failed to meet her burden for a sentence six remand because she "offer[ed] no explanation why the proffered evidence was not produced in the earlier proceeding, either in her motion or in any reply to defendant's response."
Summary of this case from Bales v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
No. 1:11-cv-354-CL
08-15-2012
SHANNON L. MAREK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review legal principles de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007).
I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff's motion to amend and correct the transcript must be denied.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#31) is adopted. Plaintiff's motion to amend and correct the transcript (#20) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE